Select your timezone:

Training/Utilization

Thursday October 19, 2023 - 13:10 to 14:10

Room: Jasmine C

122.5 Transplantation of contaminated kidneys : the utility of perioperative donor perfusate cultures

Abigail W Cheng, United States

Resident
General Surgery
Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV

Abstract

Transplantation of contaminated kidneys : the utility of perioperative donor perfusate cultures

Mary Froehlich2, Abigail Cheng2, Chelsey Wongjirad1,2, Sunil K Patel1.

1UMC Center for Transplantation, University Medical Center of Southern Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, United States; 2Surgery, UNLV School of Medicine, Las Vegas, NV, United States

Purpose: To study the impact of routine perioperative donor perfusate cultures (DPC) of preservation fluid in preventing postoperative infections after potentially contaminated  kidney transplantation.
Methods:  We routinely send fluid obtained from the transport medium during static cold preservation or machine perfusion, for aerobic ,anaerobic and fungal cultures. We studied the outcomes of all kidneys transplanted  January 1, 2020 to  December 1, 2022.  We performed a retrospective study, where we compared kidney transplant recipients who had a DPC ( Group A) with those that did not have cultures drawn (Group B).  We also compared outcomes in DPC + recipients who received antibiotics within 48 hours of a positive culture and DPC- recipients.   Data was analyzed from a report obtained by querying  a transplant database for results of donor perfusate cultures.  The charts were reviewed for antibiotic prophylaxis post exposure, surgical site infections(SSI) , bacteremia, reoperations, graft and patient survival.
A Chi-square analysis was performed to compare outcomes in the two groups. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant .

Results:  

Table(1): Outcomes of recipients when DPC is obtained
  Group A Group B p value
Recipients(n) 116 155  
Positive DPC 13(11.2%)    
Antibiotic prophylaxis 13 0  
SSI 2(1.7%) 4(2.58%) 0.63
Rexploration 5 3 0.25
1 year graft survival 115/116 152/155 0.46
1 year patient survival  115/116 153/155 0.29
Table (2): Outcomes of recipients when DPC are positive (Contaminated kidneys)
  DPC+ DPC- p value
Recipients(n) 13 104  
SSI 1 (7.69%) 2(1.9%) 0.21
Rexploration 1(7.69%) 5(4.8%) 0.65
1 year death censored graft survival 13/13(100%) 103/104 (99%) 0.72
1 year patient survival 13/13 103/104(99%) 0.72

Organisms isolated included Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, Enterococcus, Coagulase negative staphylococci, Clostridia, Klebsiella, Lactobacilli, MDR E. coli, Pseudomonas , Proteus and yeast Positive DPC was obtained in 13 of 116 (11.2%) samples tested.  All recipients with positive cultures were treated with appropriate antibiotics.  DPC -(1.9%) had the least SSI when compared to DPC+ treated with antibiotics (7.69%) and when cultures were not drawn ( 2.58%). The results however did not reach statistical significance.
Conclusions:  Donor perfusate  cultures help detect potential pathogens in 11% of kidney transplants.  Potentially contaminated kidneys, can be safely transplanted with donor perfusate culture testing and targeted antibiotics.

Sponsors


© 2025 ISODP 2023